What Does “Best Possible Shelter” Mean for School Tornado Sheltering?

Guest blog by Steve Satterly

Imagine for a moment that you find yourself in the ring with Iron Mike Tyson. He’s glaring at you, growling, and there is menace in his eyes. Then you hear the bell. Now, I don’t know about you, but even after 12 years in the Infantry, I would run like heck. As my mother didn’t raise any fools. I think that most rational people, faced with this situation, would do the same.

Now let’s change the scenario a bit. You have kids behind you, and you think he wants to hurt them (he doesn’t, but let’s go with it). You have the choice of running and leaving your children, begging for your (and their) life, or doing the best you can to protect them.

Facing a tornado is very similar to this analogy. On your own, you can most likely run for your life. Add people you are responsible for to the situation – and the decision-making changes. No one since Pecos Bill can defeat a tornado. All you can do is the best you can do. Given your responsibility to the people in your care, it is important you know what “the best you can do” is.

Many schools do not have the luxury of having a FEMA certified storm shelter with which to protect their children. They can be expensive – especially if you do a retrofit, alter existing construction to a new form, or build an addition. In FEMA publication P-431 “Tornado Protection: Selecting Refuge Areas in Buildings”, a process is described by which schools can identify “best available refuge areas”. These are areas in an existing building that have been designated by a qualified architect or engineer as a place likely to offer the greatest protection in the event of a tornado. Since these areas are not “safe rooms”, there is a possibility that people in those areas may be hurt or killed during a tornado. However, these “best available refuge areas” make such casualties less likely than in other areas of the building.

I am not an architect – nor am I an engineer. I have studied tornado mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery extensively. I have been through an EF3 tornado at a school myself. I have also seen for myself the damage to schools by EF4 tornadoes. This gives me the opportunity to let you know about some of the resources I have found, such as FEMA P-431. This can be found at http://www.fema.gov/library/ as well as other resources, which are free. If you cannot hook up with an architect or engineer, invite your local Emergency Management Director to walk through your building with you and use his or her expertise. Don’t do it alone – and don’t just take the word of some guy on the internet (even me!).

Take the time to do it right – because there is too much at stake.

Steve Satterly is the Director of School Safety and Transportation at the CSC Southern Hancock County in East Central Indiana. He is a survivor of an EF3 tornado on September 20, 2002. He is a certified Indiana School Safety Specialist with more than 75 hours of FEMA training. He is currently working toward a Master’s Certificate in Homeland Security through the School for Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA) at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis. The author welcomes questions, other viewpoints and any comments at satterly.steve@att.net.

Clark County, Nevada School District Has a World Class School Crisis Recovery Team

A school safety director just forwarded me a link to an article about the mental health recovery team in the Clark County School District in Las Vegas, Nevada. He was most impressed with what he read.

We have had the good fortune to work with the folks who operate this team as well as the Student Threat and Evaluation Team several times over the past decade or so. I must say that the district operates what I feel are hands down the best two teams of this type that we have encountered anywhere in the nation or for that matter, anywhere in the world.

The work this group of outstanding people has done over the years is truly remarkable. They have developed a number of cutting edge concepts, incorporated best practices from other schools and districts across the country to augment what they have in place and have worked tirelessly to improve on the school safety measures that they have in place. The student threat evaluation and assessment processes they have developed to help address the threat of an active shooter as well as more common types of weapons incidents and student suicide risk is most impressive. Their use of GIS mapping to identify “hot spots” in schools is also an awesome effort that has yielded tremendous results. They have also developed a truly world class drill evaluation instrument that they use to spot-check how effectively drills are conducted in the district.

To say that our analysts have been deeply impressed with their efforts would be an understatement. Bill Miller, Rosemary Virtuoso, Dr. Paul Webb, Roy Anderson and the rest of their dedicated team have continually impressed us with their attention to detail and their attitude of never accepting the status quo when it comes to student safety and school crisis preparedness.

Many School Officials Re-evaluating Tornado Procedures and Sheltering Locations

Tornado strikes on schools and communities have many school and public safety officials re-evaluating how they address the threat of tornadoes to their schools. Tornado sheltering procedures, training and drills are extremely critical school safety and school crisis preparedness topics.

We still encounter far too many schools that do not have properly written tornado protocols, do not regularly conduct tornado drills or have faulty concepts in place such as sheltering students in areas with open span roofs. We are also seeing school officials that are making significant changes to their tornado procedures without careful research because of one or two unique events. For example, many school officials have begun considering early school closure because of the near miss in Henryville, Indiana. While the decision to close school in that case clearly averted deaths of students, the loss of human life could be staggering if students and staff are caught in the middle of bus transport by a tornado elsewhere.

Concepts that have proven to reduce risk over many situations and many decades of practice should not be abandoned without careful evaluation of those concepts and of local considerations such as school design.