Basing Lockdown Protocols on Inside Versus Outside Threats Could be Dangerous

Over the past few years, our analysts have conducted more than 1,700 one-on-one crisis simulations with more than 500 school employees from 14 school districts across the nation.  Using school crisis scenario videos as well as scripted scenarios and scoring sheets in structured interviews, the results have been most revealing and help to explain what we have been seeing in forensic analysis for school crisis incidents we see when serving in the capacity of an expert witness, particularly for school shooting cases.

One of the things that we are seeing regularly is a high rate of plan failure when it comes to fast recognition of the need to implement a lockdown and effective communication of that decision.  We have noted a number of gaps between the concepts used for lockdowns and the actual effectiveness of those concepts.

One concept that fails badly when tested in this manner is the approach where the type of lockdown utilized is based on whether the threat is inside or outside of the school.  In one assessment of a large urban district that had revamped its plans under a Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools grant (REMS), a fail rate of more than 70% was noted when this approach was utilized.

We will be expounding on these findings in a white paper on school lockdowns that will be released later this Summer, but to explain it briefly, we have found that school employees have an extremely difficult time fitting the appropriate response to situations when they have been taught to do so based on the location of the incident rather than by the nature of the threat.  For example when posed with scenarios depicting violators with different types of weapons in various locations in and outside of schools, staff are usually unable to determine the need for a lockdown in the first thirty seconds even though the scenario clearly calls for one. 

As with other gaps in concept that we have identified, we have also noted that the more school officials focus on active shooter response, the worse the score for their employees for any type of scenario they are hit with that does not involve someone firing a gun.  Though the inside/outside approach to school lockdowns is popular with some school and public safety officials we feel that it is not a reliable approach and could result in needless injury and death of students and staff.

False Promises of School Security Can Result in Liability Exposure

 

We found this fake school security camera during a school security audit. The use of fake security cameras can create a false sense of security and can create problems during school safety litigation

 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quality Over Speed When Developing or Revising School Crisis Plans

I had the opportunity to do a training session for the planning team for a large school system crisis planning team today.  They were an excellent group to work with and they were very open to new ideas and strategies for plan structure. 

They are eager to work diligently to dramatically upgrade the plans that had been developed in the district previously but were concerned that the planning approach we outlined for them would take a lot of time to complete as it is much more robust than what they currently have in place.

One of the things we discussed was the need to take the time to develop really good plans rather than to rush to complete plans rapidly at the expense of quality.  This is a common challenge for school crisis planning.  We would prefer a plan development timeline of 6 to 18 months (depending on what work needs to be done) to a shorter timeline that often does not allow for proper school crisis plan development.

It is always a pleasure to work with people who are dedicated and want to develop really high quality school safety plans.

Ohio Crash Kills 3 Teens, One on Graduation Day

Cincinnati, OH

A car carrying five teenagers went airborne as it sped over railroad tracks in northeast Ohio early Sunday and crashed, killing the 18-year-old driver hours before his high school graduation and two of his passengers, the Ohio State Highway Patrol said.

The other two passengers, one of them also an impending graduate, were hospitalized.

Less than 13 hours after the crash, Brunswick High School students left empty seats covered with flowers at their graduation ceremony to remember driver Jeffrey Chaya and Kevin Fox, who was critically injured.

“It was very sad,” Superintendent Michael Mayell said after the commencement ceremony at the University of Akron. “There were a lot of tears.”

Reports of Student Suicides Related to Bullying Should Make us Consider How we Address Bullying and the Threat of Suicide

MSNBC is reporting that 12-year-old Joel Morales of New York City killed himself after being badly bullied in two different New York City Schools.  The boy’s mother and other relatives allege that the boy was repeatedly bullied because he was intelligent, because of his stature and because his father was dead.  Morales had been seeing a therapist but had been reluctant to discuss some of the problems he was encountering.

It is important to consider the broader situation when media accounts report that students have committed suicide due to bullying.  There are often other factors at play.  I have assisted a school district client after a student in the district committed suicide at home and the case was intensely and inaccurately covered in the national media.  The inaccurate coverage caused immense emotional harm to the student’s mother as well as to school officials.  In addition, a number of mental health professionals have expressed concern that sensationalist media coverage of student suicides combined with the manner in which student suicide is treated in the movie “Bully” could contribute to the decisions of students who are bullied to commit suicide.

At the same time, there does appear to be a link between severe bullying and the decisions of some students to commit suicide.  This is another reason schools and school districts should:

  1. Evaluate the level of bullying in schools using assessment based approaches
  2. Carefully consider how victims of school violence are protected by school disciplinary strategies (for example, the New York City School System has been under intensive pressure not to arrest students who attack other students and a number of school districts have dramatically reduced the use of court intervention for misdemeanor attacks on students by other students leaving them virtually defenseless).
  3. Implementing an evidence-based approach to bullying prevention such as the free Stop Bullying Now Campaign provided to any school in the nation at no cost by the federal government.  Top bullying prevention experts tend to agree that evidence based approaches can dramatically reduce bullying and the impact it has on students.
  4. Focus on improving student supervision.  This is one of the least expensive and most effective ways to reduce problematic behaviors among students as long as effective disciplinary strategies are in place.
  5. Focus on efforts to improve the connection and communications between students and staff.
  6. Suicide prevention screenings for students and training for school staff on how to detect students who may be at risk for suicide should be considered due to the significant levels suicide among school-aged students.

Bullying and student suicide are both significant issues for schools.  Research-proven bullying and suicide prevention approaches can not only help make students safer, they can help improve school climate and culture.   

Parent Pleads Guilty After Arrest for Abandoning Daughter at a Mall Because of Bad Grades

 

 This photograph taken by the author in Quinhon, Vietnam depicts several thousand Vietnamese parents, aunts, uncles, grandparents and other family members waiting in the heat for most of a day while their students sit for college entrance exams.  As the test results will not be available for about two weeks, their presence is to demonstrate to the students that education is important and that their family supports their efforts.

47-year-old Tuan Huynh plead guilty to a charge of child endangerment yesterday.  Huynh left his 16-year-old daughter at the Cheltenham Square Mall in Pennsylvania because she made a grade he considered to be unsatisfactory on a calculus test.  Fox News affiliate WTXF-TV reported that he told his daughter that she no longer met her parent’s expectations due to the grade.

Prosecutor Cara McMenamin told reporters that the young lady wandered around the mall for approximately four hours before a minister approached her and learned what had happened and notified authorities.  The court sentenced Huynh to attend parenting classes, to serve 100 hours of community service and two years on probation.  The prosecutor stated that Mr. Huynh showed no remorse for his actions.

There are aspects to this case and to the behavior of Ms. Diane Tran in the highly publicized Texas truancy case that are not surprising to me being married to a Vietnamese and having spent considerable time in Vietnam over the past seven years.  Working with school officials in Vietnam and having visited many schools there, I have noted a number of stark contrasts with our schools and culture.  Though by far not all Vietnamese could be described this way, I feel pretty comfortable stating that many Vietnamese parents and students exhibit an extraordinary focus on education.  My wife is now working on her third graduate degree after graduating with a 3.93 GPA for her second masters at Texas Tech University.  About halfway through her current degree she is maintaining a 4.0 GPA by dedicating about 40 hours per week on her studies while working on average about 60 hours per week and raising a child.  As she has told me numerous times, she does not attend school to make B’s.  She also feels that it is important for her to truly learn any subject she studies so she works far beyond what is required to make a top grade in her effort to master her subjects.  My suggestions that she reduce her study time to achieve balance in her life are dismissed offhand.

I can understand how Ms. Tran can hold down a full-time job, a part-time job and maintain her status as an honor student.  I can also understand how she maintains that she does this in part to support her family members because I have seen many examples of this in my wife’s family.  Her niece completed a BA in New Zealand and an MBA in Australia and now sends home much of her paycheck each month to help repay her parents for all of the money they invested in her education. This in turn can help them fund a college education for her younger sister.  While not all Vietnamese have this dedication to family and education, there is a very noticeable trend for these types of priorities in Vietnam and in Vietnamese Americans.

If you look at the photo and caption with this story, I submit that the reader consider if there would even be the need for a term such as AYP if  this significant a percentage of American parents found the education of their children to be so critical.

While like people from any culture, Vietnamese Americans must conform to our legal system, it may help some readers to understand the cultural factors that are likely at work in these two cases.  Many Vietnamese in Vietnam and in other countries still view a superb education as the way to a decent standard of living. Though Vietnamese society is rapidly changing, there is a pervasive hunger for education that is far different than what is the norm in the United States.